One thought on “HE910 Email attachment transmission time – comparison GSM UTRAN”
Hi,
I just made some tests sending some emails with attachment (file size about 500 KByte) using the HE910. Surprisingly the file transmission time (about 5 minutes) is the same or sometimes even less when using GSM technology instead of UTRAN technology.
Actually I thought and hoped that the transmission is ‘faster’ when using UTRAN technology.
Is there a way to make the transmission in a UMTS Network faster, or is the described issue resulting from local network availabilities and signal quality?
The transmission was tested in city area. The HE910 is using hardware flow control.
Hi,
I just made some tests sending some emails with attachment (file size about 500 KByte) using the HE910. Surprisingly the file transmission time (about 5 minutes) is the same or sometimes even less when using GSM technology instead of UTRAN technology.
Actually I thought and hoped that the transmission is ‘faster’ when using UTRAN technology.
Is there a way to make the transmission in a UMTS Network faster, or is the described issue resulting from local network availabilities and signal quality?
The transmission was tested in city area. The HE910 is using hardware flow control.